Time and again spirited negotiations take place on internet fora pertaining to an study of the status of a number of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, several of the discussants begun to branch to other negative discussions that really had nothing related to all the first questions or issues along with some actually became a little exercised and emotional, as also usually happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been demanded to be able to get into the bottom of matters and where some times a topic has been discussed on several unique boards and several issues simultaneously on a particular board! As too is average, nothing was resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning these issues coming again and again again and again directing people to writings . Unfortunately, the yahoo forums/fora are those that just limited hunting of previous messages will be possible without losing most of one's hair, and the archives sometimes are kept onto yet another yahoo site therefore this will not help matters when all one wants is to have yourself a quick summary of what others are using and when possible their reasons for adopting a certain position! This latter brings out more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question might have been quite noble and not in any respect confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, across the path of the former quest, another topic got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the heart of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic graphs. Now this is something which is found in Jyotish going back to nearly the first memories of the oldest members at the discussion that finally confessed to this type of case. I myself, though myself perhaps not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus on and much more to the point had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan matka panel chart Therefore, at the least some individuals had been utilizing varga-charts a couple of hundred decades ago and possibly maybe even just before those times.
Somewhere throughout the discussion, in another of those lists, a number of the associates made available an article in which the writer had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be used in a graph format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the more important and relevant matter of the practical virtues of utilizing navamsha varga being an second chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that early jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be used along with varga placements should only be used for ascertaining the features of planets etc..
Nowadays, those who have studied BPHS might understand , that 16 vargas were characterized by the Sage beginning with rashi ehich is known as'kshetra' (field or area) etc. This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was not a good timeless and written by one or even a group of'latter day saints' [my word, not the original poster!] In Jyotish and for that reason cannot be treated as being a timeless. Apparently, there is some support to this as could possibly be similarly expected if somebody should happen to produce a comment that Jyotish had been just a derivative of astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. A topic that has been recognized to attract even sedate jyotishis on the"warpath!"
To individuals who were still interested and intrigued by this, there looked to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Other varga kundalis would be the product of corrupt comprehension of the classics which themselves many agree might not have endured in pristine shape [while a number of them have mercifully survived in fairly great shape1]. I do not know just how much with the iceberg postulate is established facts and how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists with the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be utilised as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also because of that consideration of these deities and primal forces people represent although not in the kind of a horoscope and certainly no significant consideration has to be given to aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they'd assert, for example, that while the second house lord in navamsha is an important indicator, the simple fact it is set in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second dwelling in navamsha chart) is not important.
(b) Regardless of if explicitly clarified or not, the other stream of thinking asserts that varga kundalis have an important role to play at Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in discerning chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, for example, would hold significant influence within matters of marriage and spouse, while saptamsha chart would be of import at the examination of children in a particular nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a chart format.
I don't really recall anybody in the'camp (b)' saying that the first portion of (a) is not correct, especially, the Varga rankings must be considered, perse, for an study of strength and quality of an entire globe as prescribed within the Jyotish framework. There seemed to be a few other people who entirely denied that the veracity of thought stream (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting ensnared in the controversy. Or there were other motives, known only for them.